diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'v_windows/v/old/vlib/math/complex/complex_test.v')
| -rw-r--r-- | v_windows/v/old/vlib/math/complex/complex_test.v | 797 |
1 files changed, 797 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/v_windows/v/old/vlib/math/complex/complex_test.v b/v_windows/v/old/vlib/math/complex/complex_test.v new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ccd448e --- /dev/null +++ b/v_windows/v/old/vlib/math/complex/complex_test.v @@ -0,0 +1,797 @@ +import math +import math.complex as cmplx + +fn tst_res(str1 string, str2 string) bool { + if (math.abs(str1.f64() - str2.f64())) < 1e-5 { + return true + } + return false +} + +fn test_complex_addition() { + // Test is based on and verified from practice examples of Khan Academy + // https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/imaginary-and-complex-numbers + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(0, -10) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(-40, 8) + mut result := c1 + c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(-40, -2)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(-71, 2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(88, -12) + result = c1 + c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(17, -10)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(0, -30) + c2 = cmplx.complex(52, -30) + result = c1 + c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(52, -60)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(12, -9) + c2 = cmplx.complex(32, -6) + result = c1 + c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(44, -15)) +} + +fn test_complex_subtraction() { + // Test is based on and verified from practice examples of Khan Academy + // https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/imaginary-and-complex-numbers + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(-8, 0) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(6, 30) + mut result := c1 - c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(-14, -30)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(-19, 7) + c2 = cmplx.complex(29, 32) + result = c1 - c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(-48, -25)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(12, 0) + c2 = cmplx.complex(23, 13) + result = c1 - c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(-11, -13)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(-14, 3) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0, 14) + result = c1 - c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(-14, -11)) +} + +fn test_complex_multiplication() { + // Test is based on and verified from practice examples of Khan Academy + // https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/imaginary-and-complex-numbers + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(1, 2) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(1, -4) + mut result := c1 * c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(9, -2)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(-4, -4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-5, -3) + result = c1 * c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(8, 32)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(4, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-2, -5) + result = c1 * c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(12, -28)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(2, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(4, -4) + result = c1 * c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(0, -16)) +} + +fn test_complex_division() { + // Test is based on and verified from practice examples of Khan Academy + // https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/imaginary-and-complex-numbers + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(-9, -6) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(-3, -2) + mut result := c1 / c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(3, 0)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(-23, 11) + c2 = cmplx.complex(5, 1) + result = c1 / c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(-4, 3)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(8, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-4, 1) + result = c1 / c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(-2, 0)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(11, 24) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-4, -1) + result = c1 / c2 + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(-4, -5)) +} + +fn test_complex_conjugate() { + // Test is based on and verified from practice examples of Khan Academy + // https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/imaginary-and-complex-numbers + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(0, 8) + mut result := c1.conjugate() + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(0, -8)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(7, 3) + result = c1.conjugate() + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(7, -3)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(2, 2) + result = c1.conjugate() + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(2, -2)) + c1 = cmplx.complex(7, 0) + result = c1.conjugate() + assert result.equals(cmplx.complex(7, 0)) +} + +fn test_complex_equals() { + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(0, 8) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0, 8) + assert c1.equals(c2) + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 19) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-3, 19) + assert c1.equals(c2) +} + +fn test_complex_abs() { + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(3, 4) + assert c1.abs() == 5 + c1 = cmplx.complex(1, 2) + assert c1.abs() == math.sqrt(5) + assert c1.abs() == c1.conjugate().abs() + c1 = cmplx.complex(7, 0) + assert c1.abs() == 7 +} + +fn test_complex_angle() { + // Test is based on and verified from practice examples of Khan Academy + // https://www.khanacademy.org/math/precalculus/imaginary-and-complex-numbers + mut c := cmplx.complex(1, 0) + assert c.angle() * 180 / math.pi == 0 + c = cmplx.complex(1, 1) + assert c.angle() * 180 / math.pi == 45 + c = cmplx.complex(0, 1) + assert c.angle() * 180 / math.pi == 90 + c = cmplx.complex(-1, 1) + assert c.angle() * 180 / math.pi == 135 + c = cmplx.complex(-1, -1) + assert c.angle() * 180 / math.pi == -135 + cc := c.conjugate() + assert cc.angle() + c.angle() == 0 +} + +fn test_complex_addinv() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(-5, -7) + mut result := c1.addinv() + assert result.equals(c2) + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(3, -4) + result = c1.addinv() + assert result.equals(c2) + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1, 2) + result = c1.addinv() + assert result.equals(c2) +} + +fn test_complex_mulinv() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.067568, -0.094595) + mut result := c1.mulinv() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + println(c2.str()) + println(result.str()) + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.12, -0.16) + result = c1.mulinv() + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.2, 0.4) + result = c1.mulinv() + assert result.equals(c2) +} + +fn test_complex_mod() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut result := c1.mod() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert tst_res(result.str(), '8.602325') + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + result = c1.mod() + assert result == 5 + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + result = c1.mod() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert tst_res(result.str(), '2.236068') +} + +fn test_complex_pow() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(-24.0, 70.0) + mut result := c1.pow(2) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(117, 44) + result = c1.pow(3) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-7, -24) + result = c1.pow(4) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_root() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(2.607904, 1.342074) + mut result := c1.root(2) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1.264953, 1.150614) + result = c1.root(3) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1.068059, -0.595482) + result = c1.root(4) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_exp() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(111.889015, 97.505457) + mut result := c1.exp() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.032543, -0.037679) + result = c1.exp() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.153092, -0.334512) + result = c1.exp() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_ln() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(2.152033, 0.950547) + mut result := c1.ln() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1.609438, 2.214297) + result = c1.ln() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.804719, -2.034444) + result = c1.ln() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_arg() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(2.152033, 0.950547) + mut result := c1.arg() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert tst_res(result.str(), '0.950547') + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1.609438, 2.214297) + result = c1.arg() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert tst_res(result.str(), '2.214297') + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.804719, -2.034444) + result = c1.arg() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert tst_res(result.str(), '-2.034444') +} + +fn test_complex_log() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut b1 := cmplx.complex(-6, -2) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.232873, -1.413175) + mut result := c1.log(b1) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + b1 = cmplx.complex(3, -1) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.152198, -0.409312) + result = c1.log(b1) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + b1 = cmplx.complex(0, 9) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.298243, 1.197981) + result = c1.log(b1) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_cpow() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut r1 := cmplx.complex(2, 2) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(11.022341, -0.861785) + mut result := c1.cpow(r1) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + r1 = cmplx.complex(-4, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.118303, 0.063148) + result = c1.cpow(r1) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + r1 = cmplx.complex(8, -9) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.000000, 0.000007) + result = c1.cpow(r1) + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_sin() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(-525.794515, 155.536550) + mut result := c1.sin() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-3.853738, -27.016813) + result = c1.sin() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-3.165779, -1.959601) + result = c1.sin() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_cos() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(155.536809, 525.793641) + mut result := c1.cos() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-27.034946, 3.851153) + result = c1.cos() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(2.032723, -3.051898) + result = c1.cos() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_tan() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(-0.000001, 1.000001) + mut result := c1.tan() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.000187, 0.999356) + result = c1.tan() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.033813, -1.014794) + result = c1.tan() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_cot() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(-0.000001, -0.999999) + mut result := c1.cot() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.000188, -1.000644) + result = c1.cot() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.032798, 0.984329) + result = c1.cot() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_sec() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.000517, -0.001749) + mut result := c1.sec() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.036253, -0.005164) + result = c1.sec() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.151176, 0.226974) + result = c1.sec() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_csc() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(-0.001749, -0.000517) + mut result := c1.csc() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.005174, 0.036276) + result = c1.csc() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.228375, 0.141363) + result = c1.csc() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_asin() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.617064, 2.846289) + mut result := c1.asin() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.633984, 2.305509) + result = c1.asin() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.427079, -1.528571) + result = c1.asin() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_acos() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.953732, -2.846289) + mut result := c1.acos() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(2.204780, -2.305509) + result = c1.acos() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1.997875, 1.528571) + result = c1.acos() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_atan() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(1.502727, 0.094441) + mut result := c1.atan() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-1.448307, 0.158997) + result = c1.atan() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-1.338973, -0.402359) + result = c1.atan() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_acot() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.068069, -0.094441) + mut result := c1.acot() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.122489, -0.158997) + result = c1.acot() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.231824, 0.402359) + result = c1.acot() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_asec() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(1.503480, 0.094668) + mut result := c1.asec() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1.689547, 0.160446) + result = c1.asec() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1.757114, -0.396568) + result = c1.asec() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_acsc() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.067317, -0.094668) + mut result := c1.acsc() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.118751, -0.160446) + result = c1.acsc() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.186318, 0.396568) + result = c1.acsc() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_sinh() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(55.941968, 48.754942) + mut result := c1.sinh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(6.548120, -7.619232) + result = c1.sinh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.489056, -1.403119) + result = c1.sinh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_cosh() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(55.947047, 48.750515) + mut result := c1.cosh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-6.580663, 7.581553) + result = c1.cosh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.642148, 1.068607) + result = c1.cosh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_tanh() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.999988, 0.000090) + mut result := c1.tanh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-1.000710, 0.004908) + result = c1.tanh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-1.166736, 0.243458) + result = c1.tanh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_coth() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(1.000012, -0.000090) + mut result := c1.coth() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.999267, -0.004901) + result = c1.coth() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.821330, -0.171384) + result = c1.coth() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_sech() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.010160, -0.008853) + mut result := c1.sech() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.065294, -0.075225) + result = c1.sech() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.413149, -0.687527) + result = c1.sech() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_csch() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.010159, -0.008854) + mut result := c1.csch() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.064877, 0.075490) + result = c1.csch() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(0.221501, 0.635494) + result = c1.csch() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_asinh() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(2.844098, 0.947341) + mut result := c1.asinh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-2.299914, 0.917617) + result = c1.asinh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-1.469352, -1.063440) + result = c1.asinh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_acosh() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(2.846289, 0.953732) + mut result := c1.acosh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(2.305509, 2.204780) + result = c1.acosh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(1.528571, -1.997875) + result = c1.acosh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_atanh() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.067066, 1.476056) + mut result := c1.atanh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.117501, 1.409921) + result = c1.atanh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.173287, -1.178097) + result = c1.atanh() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_acoth() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.067066, -0.094740) + mut result := c1.acoth() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.117501, -0.160875) + result = c1.acoth() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.173287, 0.392699) + result = c1.acoth() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +// fn test_complex_asech() { +// // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha +// mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5,7) +// mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.094668,-1.503480) +// mut result := c1.asech() +// // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string +// assert result.str() == c2.str() +// c1 = cmplx.complex(-3,4) +// c2 = cmplx.complex(0.160446,-1.689547) +// result = c1.asech() +// // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string +// assert result.str() c2.str() +// c1 = cmplx.complex(-1,-2) +// c2 = cmplx.complex(0.396568,1.757114) +// result = c1.asech() +// // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string +// assert result.str() == c2.str() +// } + +fn test_complex_acsch() { + // Tests were also verified on Wolfram Alpha + mut c1 := cmplx.complex(5, 7) + mut c2 := cmplx.complex(0.067819, -0.094518) + mut result := c1.acsch() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-3, 4) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.121246, -0.159507) + result = c1.acsch() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() + c1 = cmplx.complex(-1, -2) + c2 = cmplx.complex(-0.215612, 0.401586) + result = c1.acsch() + // Some issue with precision comparison in f64 using == operator hence serializing to string + assert result.str() == c2.str() +} + +fn test_complex_re_im() { + c := cmplx.complex(2.1, 9.05) + assert c.re == 2.1 + assert c.im == 9.05 +} |